[There is no support for the idea that law enforcement would be unable to prevent terror attacks without new and unconstitutional laws, but there is that the administration could not follow old ones, let alone even now keep democracy, Iraq and terrorism straight.]
The above line was my conclusion to a letter submitted to a local paper yesterday.
Today a court backs me up. However the constitution prevails, the fact that the law which the president violated provides for imprisonment for it's violation is probably superceded by that articles of impeachment being the limits of what a president may suffer.
Federal judge orders end to wiretap program
Says warrantless domestic surveillance program is unconstitutional
Someone should be going to jail or be impeached.
The only question, is how many of each?
No comments:
Post a Comment